Today's hottest deals

Cyberpowerpc TRACER III

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemCyberpowerpc TRACER III  (all builds)
MotherboardCyberpowerPC TRACER III
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 16:55
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 658
68% 545 Pts
64-Core 633
39% 633 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1045) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.4% Average
Lighting 57.5
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 61.2
47% 63.1 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 60.1
Splatting 63.3
52% 62.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 148 91 86 53 45 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 698
Write 213
Mixed 291
SusWrite 114
72% 329 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 3
88% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 280%
Samsung 970 EVO 250GB
442GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1507 1141 774 653 750 797 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 719
Write 1,575
Mixed 617
SusWrite 937
219% 962 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 74.7
246% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 1,132
DQ Write 903
DQ Mixed 970
739% 1,002 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 208%
Great: 332%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$75
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 55 63 68 58 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 15.5
Write 1.7
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 58.2
22% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
222% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSX16GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMSX32GX4M2A2400C16 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 25.6
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 34.3
SC Mixed 27.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TRACER III Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Cyberpowerpc TRACER III

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback