Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '20 at 20:49
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 79.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 935
89% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 114
Parallax 230
114% 161 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 135
Splatting 160
114% 136 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 111%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 480GB-$250
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 178 154 182 163 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 386
Write 247
Mixed 312
SusWrite 178
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 23.2
80% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 87.3
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 97.2
70% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 65%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 134 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 142
Write 131
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 134
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.3
257% 2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
119GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 93
Write 89.2
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 93
62% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 70%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
27GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 128 127 122 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 140
Write 128
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 125
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.3
257% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 79%
SABRENT 1TB
562GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 157 157 159 161 156 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 144
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 158
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 87%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
704GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 140 138 139 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 126
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 139
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 87%
WD My Book 1TB
641GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 27
Write 24.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 12.2
29% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 22%
WD My Book 1TB
481GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 31
Write 25.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 12.2
30% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 22%
WDC WD25 00BB-00RDA0 250GB
109GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 24.4
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 13.4
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 18%
WDC WD50 00AAKB-00YSA0 500GB
382GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.9% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 25.3
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 13.4
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 4133 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4066 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 40
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.3
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 41.2
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback