Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell VxRail P580N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell VxRail P580N (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0TF0V7
Memory	355.6 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210423
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration	329 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8276 6 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU1, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 94.2 2-Core 189 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 757 67% 567 Pts	64-Core 2,930 181% 2,930 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dellboss VD 240GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: MV.R00-0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 254 253 253 255 255 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 442 Write 259 Mixed 235 SusWrite 253 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 63.4 4K Mixed 26.9 106% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 195 DQ Mixed 174 145% 211 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 78%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80 92,081 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 410GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1987 1876 1869 1864 1097 209 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	287% Outstanding	Read 1,630 Write 2,092 Mixed 1,728 SusWrite 1,484 392% 1,733 MB/s	4K Read 59.2 4K Write 163 4K Mixed 84 284% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,068 DQ Write 883 DQ Mixed 981 733% 978 MB/s
Poor: 144% ↑ This bench: 287% Great: 295%
Micron_7300_MTFDHBE7T6TDF 7.5TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 214% 6.5TB free Firmware: 95420100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1160 1157 1152 1161 1146 1147 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	221% Outstanding	Read 1108 Write 1,771 Mixed 947 SusWrite 1,154 282% 1,245 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 52.3 199% 81.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,207 DQ Write 812 DQ Mixed 1,026 761% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 173% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 275%
Samsung MZQLB960HAJR-00007 960GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 2.5TB free Firmware: EDA5202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 1037 1036 1038 1032 1042 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	197% Outstanding	Read 1474 Write 626 Mixed 1,150 SusWrite 1034 239% 1,071 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 38.9 138% 39.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,096 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 535 445% 663 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 197% Great: 315%
Samsung MZQLB960HAJR-00007 960GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 2.5TB free Firmware: EDA5202Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1093 1109 1126 1115 1125 1109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 1,477 Write 985 Mixed 1,550 SusWrite 1,113 288% 1,281 MB/s	4K Read 47.1 4K Write 33.7 4K Mixed 39 139% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,126 DQ Write 372 DQ Mixed 554 460% 684 MB/s
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 315%
DELL IDSDM 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 60GB free, PID a101 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	22.7% Poor	Read 40.3 Write 37 Mixed 37.7 SusWrite 37.2 52% 38 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 3.3 215% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMAA8GR7AJR4N-WM 6x31.8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 6 of 48 slots used 191GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.7% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 11.1 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.2 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	28	19	64	0"	1024 768

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248	Nvidia RTX 4070 $278	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback