Today's hottest deals

HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory160GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 160GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
12 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory150.1 GB free of 160 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 31 '23 at 10:23
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4114
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 67.3
1-Core 84
2-Core 152
59% 101 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 601
53% 452 Pts
64-Core 1,927
119% 1,927 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 124
Parallax 126
90% 120 fps
MRender 91.4
Gravity 118
Splatting 106
86% 105 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 89%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB2T0HMLB-000H1 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXB71H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1947 1965 1966 1914 1167 1160 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,024
Write 1,977
Mixed 1,412
SusWrite 1,686
399% 1,775 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 46.7
151% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 266
199% 269 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 243%
Great: 328%
Samsung MZVLB2T0HMLB-000H1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: EXB71H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1989 1948 2035 2028 1155 1146 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,051
Write 2,018
Mixed 1,411
SusWrite 1,717
405% 1799 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 50.5
162% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 327
241% 319 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 251%
Great: 328%
Micron_7300_MTFDHBE7T6TDF 7.5TB
7TB free
Firmware: 95420260
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1191 1182 1147 1567 1322 840 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
173% Outstanding
Read 951
Write 1,608
Mixed 807
SusWrite 1,208
260% 1,144 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 41.5
137% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 397
300% 403 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 173%
Great: 275%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF M393A2K40CB2-CVF Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM M393A2K40CB2-CVF M393A2K40CB2-CVF M393A2K40CB2-CVF M393A2K40CB2-CVF Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM Hynix HMA81GR7CJR8N... 160GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.5% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 43
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 50: 0P 3R 6G 17B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
50% 27% 95 531 431 60 33.1" 1707 960 AOC3279 Q3279WG5B
History: Score 34: 0P 4R 2G 8B | Score 47: 0P 4R 4G 15B | Score 50: 0P 3R 6G 17B
Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback