Dell VxRail P580N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory384GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 384GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell VxRail P580N  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0TF0V7
Memory370.8 GB free of 384 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '21 at 02:09
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8276
CPU1, 1 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 722
66% 552 Pts
64-Core 2,944
182% 2,944 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dellboss VD 240GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 218 234 234 234 248 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 408
Write 251
Mixed 228
SusWrite 230
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 27.7
109% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 175
144% 207 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 78%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$64
424GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1518 1576 1872 1836 1760 923 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 1495
Write 2,216
Mixed 1,700
SusWrite 1,581
396% 1,748 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 91.5
310% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 958
DQ Mixed 1,048
787% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 300%
Great: 295%
Micron_7300_MTFDHBE7T6TDF 7.5TB
7TB free
Firmware: 95420100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1809 1807 1802 1802 1804 1799 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
275% Outstanding
Read 1,246
Write 1,837
Mixed 981
SusWrite 1,804
333% 1467 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 56.4
223% 90.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,289
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 1,055
785% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 275%
Great: 275%
Samsung MZQLB960HAJR-00007 960GB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EDA5202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 726 733 726 720 718 721 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,482
Write 1,073
Mixed 1,484
SusWrite 724
267% 1,191 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 41.4
147% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,155
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 564
469% 699 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 183%
Great: 315%
Samsung MZQLB960HAJR-00007 960GB
2.5TB free
Firmware: EDA5202Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 734 730 731 739 739 737 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,454
Write 1,093
Mixed 1,561
SusWrite 735
272% 1,211 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 41.3
147% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,209
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 586
488% 728 MB/s
Poor: 185%
This bench: 184%
Great: 315%
DELL IDSDM 64GB
60GB free, PID a101
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.8% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 36.5
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 37.5
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 3.2
211% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMAA8GR7AJR4N-WM 6x31.8GB
6 of 48 slots used
191GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 10.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 14 4 64 0" 1024 768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $116
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $195Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $373
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback