Asus P8P67

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '21 at 23:20
Run Duration	306 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 96.4 1-Core 106 2-Core 180 77% 128 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 312 42% 316 Pts	64-Core 309 19% 309 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 8528) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33% Below average	Lighting 41.4 Reflection 46.7 Parallax 41.5 34% 43.2 fps	MRender 37.9 Gravity 41.2 Splatting 36.9 32% 38.7 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST1000NM0055-1V410C 1TB 516 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 253GB free (System drive) Firmware: DA03 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,780 Write 16.3 Mixed 30.5 674% 942 MB/s	4K Read 551 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1 23,085% 184 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 119%
Hitachi HUA722010ALA330 1TB 4,323 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 749GB free Firmware: JP4ONA01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4104 Write 46.3 Mixed 88.3 1,013% 1,413 MB/s	4K Read 788 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.5 33,129% 264 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 261GB free Firmware: MS2O Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 111 Write 132 Mixed 36.8 68% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Hitachi UltraStar 7K4000 2TB 3,101 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 10GB free Firmware: MF6OAA70 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,115 Write 49.3 Mixed 84.3 777% 1,083 MB/s	4K Read 537 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.8 22,816% 181 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 405GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 153 Write 125 Mixed 35 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$22 9,374 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 432GB free Firmware: LV5B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,243 Write 63.5 Mixed 91.3 1,051% 1,466 MB/s	4K Read 780 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 5.1 33,127% 263 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 103%
Seagate ST2000NM 0033-9ZM175 2TB 181 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 201GB free Firmware: SN07 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,976 Write 50.5 Mixed 83 982% 1,370 MB/s	4K Read 725 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 4.3 30,739% 244 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 26GB free, PID 8561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 3,348 Write 18 Mixed 49.3 770% 1,139 MB/s	4K Read 543 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.6 2,101% 182 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 47%
USB 3.0 3TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 196GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 103 Write 108 Mixed 23.3 93% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 51%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-00TMA0 500GB 78GB free, PID 8561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 50 Write 48.5 Mixed 41 59% 46.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s

Seagate Desktop 640GB 480GB free, PID 3343 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 98 Write 36.5 Mixed 43.8 65% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 43% 0.6 MB/s

Generic Flash Disk 64GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 57GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 6.6 2.7 4 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	4.73% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 3.3 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 5.8 14% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.73% Great: 30%
Philips USB Flash Drive 64GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 15 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	9.85% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 13.8 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 14.3 20% 15.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1 79% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 9.85% Great: 10%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 5GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 96.8 Write 12 Mixed 12.3 SusWrite 11.8 30% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1 86% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 691 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 20.3 62% 21.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 20 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 52.5 76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	446x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	358x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	200x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	118x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	35x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16