Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory116.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJul 23 '21 at 16:10
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 64
2-Core 155
60% 101 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 714
62% 527 Pts
64-Core 1,726
107% 1,726 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 68.5
59% 71.6 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 67.5
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS960GD0FEI-A430A 960GB
633GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11030G00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 1160 1146 1154 1196 1191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 960
Write 1095
Mixed 988
SusWrite 1,160
238% 1,051 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 49
166% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 675
DQ Write 579
DQ Mixed 631
472% 628 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 189%
Great: 268%
Samsung MZ1LB1T9HALS-000FB 2TB
825GB free
Firmware: EDA7AF2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 891 927 917 921 959 957 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,227
Write 892
Mixed 899
SusWrite 929
221% 987 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 49.4
167% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 698
523% 697 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 189%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
136% Outstanding
MC Read 62.7
MC Write 55.6
MC Mixed 50.1
160% 56.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 14.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 136%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 165 32" 1280 720 AUS32F3 ASUS PG329
Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,489
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback