Dell PowerEdge R730

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive130% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell PowerEdge R730
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R730  (all builds)
Memory250.1 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 06 '22 at 19:25
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
CPU1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 161
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 630
56% 475 Pts
64-Core 2571
159% 2571 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 41
Parallax 38.8
30% 38.9 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 27.3
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 1TB
747GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 487 488 487 489 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 483
Mixed 454
SusWrite 487
108% 481 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 65.6
213% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 282
214% 291 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 130%
Great: 120%
Samsung MZ1LB1T9HALS-000FB 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: EDA73F2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1326 1355 1356 1354 1355 1353 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 2150
Write 1,305
Mixed 1,247
SusWrite 1,350
338% 1,513 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 69.1
234% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1,138
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 889
680% 931 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 283%
Great: 283%
Samsung 860 2TB
928GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 489 489 489 489 489 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 491
Mixed 425
SusWrite 488
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 55
193% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 292
218% 289 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 123%
Great: 119%
Seagate ST91000640SS 1TB
259GB free
Firmware: AS0D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 32.9
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 34
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
259GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 92 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 50.1
Write 86
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 90.4
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
162% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST91000640SS 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: AS0D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 108
Write 37.2
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 39
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
25GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 20 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 17.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 18.6
26% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
132% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SHB724G4LML23P2-SB 8x31.9GB
8 of 24 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
118% Outstanding
MC Read 56.7
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 47.5
136% 47.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 18.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge R730 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge R730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback