Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory60.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '22 at 07:42
Run Duration387 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 151
2-Core 300
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 847
88% 706 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
CLim: 1622 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 105
Parallax 144
77% 115 fps
MRender 86.9
Gravity 102
Splatting 74.3
71% 87.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1904 1763 1797 1800 1966 1935 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2,065
Write 1,790
Mixed 872
SusWrite 1,861
369% 1,647 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 67
244% 91.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,224
DQ Write 1,153
DQ Mixed 1,104
852% 1,160 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 324%
Great: 353%
Samsung MZCL21T9HCJR-00AMV 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: GDA62M4Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2154 2334 2207 2142 2165 2166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
377% Outstanding
Read 2,098
Write 2,129
Mixed 1,690
SusWrite 2,195
457% 2,028 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 213
4K Mixed 88.7
302% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,647
DQ Write 1,310
DQ Mixed 1,459
1,097% 1,472 MB/s
Poor: 368%
This bench: 377%
Great: 385%
HFS960GD0FEI-A430A 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: 11030G00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1327 1334 1329 1334 1333 1332 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,086
Write 1,339
Mixed 1,306
SusWrite 1,332
287% 1,266 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 75.1
263% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,555
DQ Write 1243
DQ Mixed 1,105
907% 1,301 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 268%
Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 26.4
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $699
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback