Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	78.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200915
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '21 at 17:15
Run Duration	385 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Memory 80.9 1-Core 141 2-Core 280 91% 168 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 798 84% 675 Pts	64-Core 1,014 63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Gigabyte(1458 2308) CLim: 1657 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.9% Very good	Lighting 97.9 Reflection 109 Parallax 159 80% 122 fps	MRender 95.6 Gravity 115 Splatting 78.6 77% 96.4 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,616 Write 2,508 Mixed 1,817 515% 2,314 MB/s	4K Read 67.3 4K Write 182 4K Mixed 94.9 320% 115 MB/s	DQ Read 1,150 DQ Write 826 DQ Mixed 936 713% 971 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
WD WD100EDAZ-11F3RA0 10TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 921GB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 99 99 99 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 89.7 Write 100 Mixed 76.7 SusWrite 99.3 68% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1.4 385% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 404GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 123 126 131 126 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Read 50 Write 67.2 Mixed 51 SusWrite 125 54% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.4 159% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 90%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 495GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 144 147 141 144 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 137 Write 146 Mixed 81 SusWrite 146 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.1 302% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 105%
WD WD101EDBZ-11B1DA0 10TB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2.5TB free Firmware: 85.00A85 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 142 140 136 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 126 Write 132 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 139 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 1.5 360% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 116%
WD WD80EMAZ-00WJTA0 8TB 5,351 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 753GB free Firmware: 83.H0A83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 107 103 104 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 150 Write 161 Mixed 83.4 SusWrite 108 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1 310% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 105%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 131GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 33 37 36 38 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 84.2 Write 102 Mixed 64.5 SusWrite 36 95% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.5 227% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK03 10TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 140 138 147 140 147 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 194 Write 178 Mixed 129 SusWrite 143 213% 161 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 6.2 4K Mixed 1 256% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 92%
External USB3.0 DISK04 6TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 131GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 35 35 38 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 84.2 Write 88.5 Mixed 76 SusWrite 35.3 94% 71 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 85%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 372GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 33 37 36 38 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 135 Write 146 Mixed 105 SusWrite 36 137% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK02 8TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 85GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 36 36 34 38 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 86 Write 83 Mixed 44.2 SusWrite 37.5 80% 62.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.2 210% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 73%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 12TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1.5TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 89 92 90 90 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 178 Write 171 Mixed 121 SusWrite 88.9 183% 140 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 0.9 371% 5.53 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 5.3 DQ Mixed 1.3 227% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 80%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 12TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 50GB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 89 92 90 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 84.2 Write 84.7 Mixed 76 SusWrite 88.9 114% 83.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 0.8 357% 4.3 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 4.9 DQ Mixed 1.2 210% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 34.7 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 25.6 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 36.3 82% 28.5 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 30: 4R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
30%	22%	45	329	267	165	24"	1920 1080	AUS24AC VG248

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $262

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $149Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	2,210x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $160Bench 98%, 89,263 samples	1,765x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $128Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,287x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $709Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	944x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	911x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $275Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	718x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	614x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $113Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	446x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	408x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	311x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	309x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	286x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350