Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 01:47
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$168
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 79.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 250
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 792
77% 630 Pts
64-Core 928
58% 928 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 108%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B2S7JA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,876
Write 967
Mixed 88.6
211% 977 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 62.2
210% 73.6 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 458
342% 471 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 271%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 45 49 51 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 168
Write 174
Mixed 98.1
SusWrite 51.1
91% 123 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.2
315% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$113
197GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 65 81 69 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 102
Mixed 60
SusWrite 56.7
51% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.5
165% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$100
244GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 125 116 106 132 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 79.7
Write 99.5
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 128
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
157% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 88%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
249GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 144 154 160 156 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 193
Mixed 99.9
SusWrite 155
115% 156 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
258% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 105%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
164GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 66 57 61 64 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 119
Write 117
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 64.1
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 87%
WD WD80EDBZ-11B0ZA0 8TB
298GB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 118 117 123 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 183
Write 184
Mixed 97.6
SusWrite 118
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.3
283% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 117%
WD WD101EMAZ-11G7DA0 10TB
125GB free
Firmware: 0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 115 133 129 136 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 120
Write 129
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 127
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1
270% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71%
Great: 118%
WD WD101EDBZ-11B1DA0 10TB
127GB free
Firmware: 85.00A85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 97 110 113 126 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 118
Write 134
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 112
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.2
290% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 116%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$30
298GB free
Firmware: 1K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 42 46 50 50 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 107
Write 106
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 52
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 90%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$30
298GB free
Firmware: 1K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 94 119 124 126 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 119
Write 126
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 112
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3001 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 26.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 20.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z590-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $650
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback