Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S2PH  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 19 '21 at 18:43
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 162
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 298
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 314
20% 314 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 27
Parallax 19.7
11% 20.2 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 15.1
Splatting 19.2
16% 19.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 92 50 39 33 22 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 261
Write 257
Mixed 146
SusWrite 71.9
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 11.9
50% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 64.8
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 3.3
24% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
222GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45% Average
Read 99.9
Write 12.9
Mixed 57.4
SusWrite 56.7
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
251GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 82 83 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
69% Good
Read 158
Write 152
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 82.1
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69%
Great: 109%
External USB3.0 DISK02 500GB
31GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 7.7 5.7 6.9 3.5 6.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 52.5
Write 61
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 6.4
51% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 38%
External USB3.0 DISK03 500GB
304GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 106 108 110 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 121
Write 116
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 107
137% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%
External USB3.0 DISK00 1TB
297GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 19 22 13 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 160
Write 130
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 18.3
123% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 74%
External USB3.0 DISK01 1TB
502GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.2 0.5 3.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 177
Write 147
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 1.5
126% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 67%
External USB3.0 DISK04 1TB
630GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 104 104 108 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 160
Write 166
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 103
167% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 67%
ADATA HD710 1TB
64GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 36 37 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 36.1
Write 7
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 35.3
28% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 11.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S2PH Builds (Compare 763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S2PH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback