Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	55.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210510
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 15 '21 at 21:58
Run Duration	350 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 83.5 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 79% 141 Pts	4-Core 444 8-Core 763 73% 603 Pts	64-Core 1,236 76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% EVGA(3842 1071) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3505 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 119 Parallax 125 110% 126 fps	MRender 162 Gravity 120 Splatting 90.5 98% 124 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,309 Write 700 Mixed 988 221% 999 MB/s	4K Read 53.1 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 62.4 207% 67.8 MB/s	DQ Read 874 DQ Write 546 DQ Mixed 713 530% 711 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 422GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2092 724 609 609 610 608 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	259% Outstanding	Read 2,508 Write 2,013 Mixed 1,590 SusWrite 875 390% 1,747 MB/s	4K Read 56.9 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 70 231% 77 MB/s	DQ Read 948 DQ Write 558 DQ Mixed 800 583% 769 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 259% Great: 340%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 314GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 463 462 459 462 461 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 446 Mixed 451 SusWrite 448 104% 464 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 51.3 168% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 373 281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 931GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 380 383 377 382 379 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 390 Write 378 Mixed 359 SusWrite 369 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 36.7 4K Mixed 30.7 102% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 224 163% 213 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 731GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 133 134 133 133 133 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 83.8 Mixed 78.6 SusWrite 131 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 113%
Sony MRW-G2 160GB 83GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Seagate BUP BK 4TB 13,353 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 267GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 99 99 97 96 99 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 65.3 Write 22 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 93.6 46% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.3 221% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 65%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 153 153 153 155 152 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
ProGrade SD PG08 64GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 49GB free, PID a012 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 38 Write 19.7 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 13.7 27% 22.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.2 88% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 105%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 7.7 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	7.21% Terrible	Read 26.4 Write 11.7 Mixed 10.9 SusWrite 7.6 16% 14.1 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 29% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.21% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139 14,506 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	MC Read 43 MC Write 40.4 MC Mixed 37.5 115% 40.3 GB/s	SC Read 29.3 SC Write 43.3 SC Mixed 35.6 103% 36.1 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 135%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 55: 7R 6G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
55%	36%	42	331	266	60	34.1"	3440 1440	GSM5AE2 LG ULTRAWIDE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 860 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	268x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	87x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $189Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	80x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	61x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	45x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	39x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	35x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	38x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $976

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 55: 7R 6G 2B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 5 WIFI - $475

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)