Today's hottest deals

Medionpc MS-7501

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedionpc MS-7501  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDIONPC MS-7501
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '22 at 15:37
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom X3 8450
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 30.6
2-Core 62.5
38% 55.4 Pts
4-Core 95.7
8-Core 96.2
13% 95.9 Pts
64-Core 96.2
6% 96.2 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 124 125 123 103 125 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.2% Below average
Read 210
Write 124
Mixed 147
SusWrite 127
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 17.1
64% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 63.9
46% 58.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 85%
Generic Flash HS-MS/SD 64GB
58GB free, PID 2228
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 10 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.2% Very poor
Read 14.6
Write 11.6
Mixed 13.1
SusWrite 10.6
17% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2
135% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 2.3
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.6
4% 3.72 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
22.1% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 8.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-7501 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7501

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback