HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1998
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161004
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '17 at 17:09
Run Duration	395 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 78.4 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 195 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 371 48% 364 Pts	64-Core 364 22% 364 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1998) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4568 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Lighting 3.63 Reflection 6.58 Parallax 6.78 3% 5.66 fps	MRender 9.38 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 7.74 5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 3%
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.7 Reflection 15.6 Parallax 18.6 16% 18 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 20.2 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 120GB 699 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 640 Write 132 Mixed 193 69% 322 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 13.8 50% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 98.9 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 27.4 42% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 94%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37 11,382 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2.5TB free Firmware: MKAONS00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 179 179 25798050225 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 107 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 40138 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 59 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1826 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1826 (C2) HDA temperature 120 120 214748954674 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	88.2% Excellent	Read 151 Write 157 Mixed 119 106% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.48 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA MK8032GAX 80GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 44GB free, PID 2507 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 27.7 Write 28 Mixed 14.1 29% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.17 40% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 14%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 G2 USB 3.0 32GB-$30 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 13GB free, PID 16a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 148 Write 35.1 Mixed 59.5 83% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 11.2 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.81 110% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 42%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB 1,300 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 3GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 39 Write 42.3 Mixed 14.9 39% 32.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.18 56% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 20%
Generic USB SD Reader 1GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 0330 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.61% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 7.82 Mixed 6.61 10% 8.64 MB/s	4K Read 4.87 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 20% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 4.61% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	50% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 15.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.5 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 83.7 48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	1,898x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	1,611x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	894x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	3,516x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	440x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	424x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	368x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	118x
KingFast 256GBBench 72%, 7,147 samples	116x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	93x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	85x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	79x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16