Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 20208

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 20208 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 20208
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 23 '17 at 04:07
Run Duration	575 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70 34,445 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 83.3 1-Core 65.6 2-Core 94.5 53% 81.1 Pts	4-Core 163 8-Core 158 22% 160 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 5002) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.31% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 4.81 Parallax 2.5 3% 3.66 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 6.91 4% 4.54 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.31% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB 89,596 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 648GB free (System drive) Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 79 64 71249824 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 8 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 73 60 18803848 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 138658724184768 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 54 706871338 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 165 (C2) HDA temperature 42 46 85899345962 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -81037442940226 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1699476649 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2033884486 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	67.5% Good	Read 121 Write 114 Mixed 94.2 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.37 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.25 119% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 71%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1.5TB 1,258 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 594GB free Firmware: 0302 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 95.1 Write 95.1 Mixed 105 74% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.36 98% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 65%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB 393 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 196GB free, PID ce21 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 38.1 Mixed 37.3 48% 37.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.27 45% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 19%
Seagate Backup+ BK 500GB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 196GB free, PID a013 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 84.4 Write 85.3 Mixed 65.2 99% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.35 78% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 41%
StoreJet Transcend 320GB 727 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 98GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 37.1 Write 34.8 Mixed 34.9 46% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.36 73% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 20%
TOSHIBA MK8032GAX 80GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 50GB free, PID 2507 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 30.2 Mixed 27.3 37% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.26 47% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 14%
SAMSUNG MZ8PA128HMCD-010 128GB 22GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.8% Average	Read 36.3 Write 36.5 Mixed 36.5 47% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.82 4K Write 9.76 4K Mixed 4.85 522% 7.15 MB/s	DQ Read 7.34 DQ Write 11.4 DQ Mixed 4.72 574% 7.81 MB/s

SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB 4,876 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 5GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	7.61% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 3.27 Mixed 7.08 10% 10.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.07 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 1.22 88% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.61% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB 175 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 17 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 13.6 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20208 Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20208

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	78x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	60x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	38x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	190x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	31x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	26x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
A400 480GBKingston $30Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
1x4GBSHARETRONICBench 29%, 887 samples	15x
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,855 samples	12x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $95

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $123
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350