Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '21 at 13:25
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 82.9
1-Core 129
2-Core 244
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 511
68% 509 Pts
64-Core 490
30% 490 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2768) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 33
Parallax 39.9
26% 34.9 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 41.2
Splatting 33.8
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 232 251 257 254 257 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 416
Mixed 314
SusWrite 243
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 47.9
162% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 201
152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 111%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$81
649GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 115 116 117 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 114
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB KHX1600C9D3/4GX Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $734
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback