Asus G20CB

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus G20CB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G20CB
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160624
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '17 at 09:12
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$170 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 225 78% 140 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 648 66% 536 Pts	64-Core 649 40% 649 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8725) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.6% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 134 Parallax 117 102% 125 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 119 Splatting 103 90% 111 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U512G1002 512GB 2,367 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4131002 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 790 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 196 (A5) Unknown 100 100 425321694807 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 34 (A8) Unknown 100 100 25 (A9) Unknown 100 100 434 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 11 (AE) Unknown 100 100 23 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 65 279174447147 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 4668649964607 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 5839 (EA) Unknown 100 100 15628 (F1) Unknown 253 253 12870 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2797 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	62.5% Good	Read 450 Write 194 Mixed 246 65% 297 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 17.1 76% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 9.21 64% 151 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 902GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 68 (03) Spinup time 173 173 12893618308 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 357 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 788 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 194 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2240 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2240 (C2) HDA temperature 130 130 240519807022 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	103% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 182 Mixed 179 136% 180 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.2 81% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 107%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 858GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 102 Write 103 Mixed 76.3 119% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.19 47% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 43%
HGST HTS 545050A7E380 500GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 465GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 101 Write 85.1 Mixed 78.1 110% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.16 38% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 36%
FUJITSU MHW2040BH 40GB 37GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.6% Very poor	Read 44.4 Write 44.9 Mixed 36.5 53% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.31 48% 0.61 MB/s

FUJITSU MHW2040BH 40GB 37GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.9% Very poor	Read 45.2 Write 45.6 Mixed 31.4 51% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.28 48% 0.62 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 8,819 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 81.2 49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G20CB Builds (Compare 1,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 51%

Yacht

System: Asus G20CB

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	860x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	125x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	264x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	208x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	117x

SSD
HFS256G32MND-2200A 256GBBench 70%, 3,087 samples	94x
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GBBench 62%, 1,849 samples	79x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	30x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	348x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 66%, 14,350 samples	170x
M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 38%, 8,819 samples	103x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $448

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363