Today's hottest deals

Asus GL702VT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL702VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL702VT
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160930
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 15:42
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 49.7
1-Core 80
2-Core 134
50% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 416
42% 338 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Asus(1043 1310) 3GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.57
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.6% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 51.3
Parallax 36.6
27% 40.4 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 36.3
Splatting 30.7
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WDS120G2G0B- 120GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 55 2.5 35 36 8.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 85%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
882GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 107 108 109 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 108
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
163% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL702VT Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus GL702VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback