Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics61.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '21 at 01:14
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 154
2-Core 301
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 807
86% 684 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 100%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.2% Good
Lighting 76.7
Reflection 78.4
Parallax 72.5
62% 75.9 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 71.4
59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$87
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 541 295 296 295 293 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 2,046
Write 1,358
Mixed 610
SusWrite 335
240% 1,087 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 54.1
230% 88.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,069
DQ Write 1,053
DQ Mixed 813
679% 978 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 219%
Great: 236%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
779GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 917 511 510 512 510 511 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
H/W DISK 1 10TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 180
Write 173
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 40
153% 122 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.1
251% 7.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 76%
H/W DISK 2 10TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 160
Write 153
Mixed 88.6
SusWrite 40.1
140% 110 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 6.9 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 95%
H/W DISK 3 10TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 196
Write 194
Mixed 100
SusWrite 40
167% 133 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.1
247% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 67%
H/W DISK 4 5TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 122 119 120 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 88
Write 160
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 120
154% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 0.9
395% 4.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 1
430% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3200-MR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 27.8
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 30.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 52
77% 52 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $823
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback