Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics64.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '19 at 17:02
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 283
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 786
77% 632 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.4% Good
Lighting 81.1
Reflection 79
Parallax 69.6
66% 76.6 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 76.1
61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$74
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 556 285 283 276 273 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,082
Write 1,454
Mixed 591
SusWrite 324
245% 1,113 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 50.3
193% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,079
DQ Write 1,109
DQ Mixed 704
637% 964 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 211%
Great: 236%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 146 149 153 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 136
Write 134
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 148
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 135 135 136 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 136
Write 127
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 136
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 140 140 143 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 165
Write 129
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 140
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 146 147 148 148 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 162
Write 144
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 148
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89%
Great: 83%
H/W DISK 1 10TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 28 25 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 121
Write 180
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 26.9
138% 104 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.1
236% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 76%
H/W DISK 2 10TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 23 25 21 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 216
Write 215
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 21.8
168% 136 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
266% 7.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55%
Great: 95%
H/W DISK 3 10TB
6TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 28 25 21 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 240
Write 233
Mixed 113
SusWrite 26.9
190% 153 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
279% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 67%
H/W DISK 4 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 84 81 74 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 98.3
Write 137
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 85.6
135% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 1
373% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 1.1
464% 4.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3200-MR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 20.7
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 23.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 60.6
66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $986
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback