Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics63.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 27 '19 at 07:14
Run Duration279 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 97.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 297
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 571
8-Core 826
87% 698 Pts
64-Core 826
51% 826 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.4% Good
Lighting 80.4
Reflection 80.2
Parallax 69.5
66% 76.7 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 73.3
59% 72 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$74
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 531 278 274 271 268 263 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,492
Write 1422
Mixed 619
SusWrite 314
214% 962 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 43.9
210% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,101
DQ Write 1,224
DQ Mixed 893
747% 1,073 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 193%
Great: 236%
ST10000VN0004-1ZD101 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 466 452 450 450 449 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 472
Write 451
Mixed 395
SusWrite 458
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 41.5
173% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 150 149 151 149 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 146
Write 133
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 149
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 141 141 141 143 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 145
Write 140
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 140
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 83%
H/W DISK 1 10TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 83 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 174
Write 161
Mixed 110
SusWrite 81.6
171% 132 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 76%
H/W DISK 2 10TB
3TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 83 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 217
Write 212
Mixed 96
SusWrite 81.6
193% 152 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
256% 6.97 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 95%
H/W DISK 3 10TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 83 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 212
Write 203
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 81.6
187% 147 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
264% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 67%
H/W DISK 4 5TB
4TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 174 175 173 175 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 91.5
Write 147
Mixed 65
SusWrite 174
170% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 11.4
4K Mixed 0.8
418% 4.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 13.5
DQ Mixed 1
495% 5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GX-D4-3200-MR 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 27.2
98% 34.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 39.4
SC Mixed 31.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 47.7
84% 47.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 7 - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $994
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback