Asus N551JQ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAsus N551JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N551JQ
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '21 at 14:31
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 262
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 845M
Asus(1043 177D) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5946
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 15
13% 14.9 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 11.3
9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
718GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 75 76 77 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 85.2
Write 80.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 75.6
50% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.2
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 19.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N551JQ Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N551JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback