Asus N551JQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemAsus N551JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N551JQ
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '18 at 18:08
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 26.2
2-Core 83.3
43% 64 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 269
25% 210 Pts
64-Core 524
32% 524 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 845M
Asus(1043 177D) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3360
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.95% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 10.3
9% 11.3 fps
MRender 6.71
Gravity 14.1
Splatting 9.35
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.95%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 289 292 293 294 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 396
Write 293
Mixed 261
SusWrite 291
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 16.7
62% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 240
193% 270 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.2
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.7
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N551JQ Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N551JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback