Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Memory 82.6 1-Core 26.2 2-Core 83.3 43% 64 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 269 25% 210 Pts	64-Core 524 32% 524 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 845M 109 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Asus(1043 177D) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.3360 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	8.95% Terrible	Lighting 11.4 Reflection 12.1 Parallax 10.3 9% 11.3 fps	MRender 6.71 Gravity 14.1 Splatting 9.35 8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.95% Great: 12%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 330GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 289 292 293 294 293 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 396 Write 293 Mixed 261 SusWrite 291 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 16.7 62% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 293 DQ Mixed 240 193% 270 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 2x8GB 1,622 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 17.2 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 7.7 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	42x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	9x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	38x
GeForce 845MNvidiaBench 11%, 109 samples	13x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $53Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	3x
U100 24GBSandiskBench 31%, 1,395 samples	3x
SMSM151S3128GD 128GBKingstonBench 45%, 1,082 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	12x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	7x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 12GBHynixBench 39%, 1,404 samples	7x

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $53