Asus N551JQ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus N551JQ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N551JQ
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 19:01
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 197
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 522
52% 426 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 845M
Asus(1043 177D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8857
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 13.8
13% 14.3 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 11.2
9% 11.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SMSM151S3128GD 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM01.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 55 45 33 35 15 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 457
Write 114
Mixed 140
SusWrite 46
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 9.1
67% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 34.3
DQ Mixed 8.6
24% 52.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 59%
Hitachi HTS541515A9E630 1.5TB
835GB free
Firmware: KA0OA500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 102 102 104 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60% Good
Read 106
Write 101
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 103
62% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 60%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 20.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N551JQ Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N551JQ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback