ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G551JM

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G551JM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G551JM
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141013
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '16 at 18:19
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4710HQ 69,536 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 103 2-Core 192 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 523 54% 436 Pts	64-Core 523 32% 523 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 185D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.16% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 16 Parallax 7.16 3% 9.1 fps	MRender 10 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.3 6% 6.94 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.16% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 244 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1149 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 304 (64) Unknown 100 100 687168 (65) Unknown 100 100 145056 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 121 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 206 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1416 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 33 100 184684838945 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 244 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 244 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1108 (EA) Unknown 100 100 579 (F1) Unknown 100 100 902 (F2) Unknown 100 100 1469 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 244	38.3% Below average	Read 246 Write 134 Mixed 88.2 34% 156 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 8.73 52% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 52.6 DQ Mixed 25.4 42% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 88%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 570GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 125 125 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1068 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 5484 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 845 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 17 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 81 81 193086 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 206158823459 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	68.7% Good	Read 121 Write 119 Mixed 122 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.2 82% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB 262 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 16.9 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 19.6 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G551JM Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G551JM

CPU
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	369x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	16x
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	240x
GTX 860MNvidiaBench 16%, 18,736 samples	147x

SSD
X300s Non-Secure 256GBSanDiskBench 82%, 2,451 samples	22x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	11x
MX500 1TBCrucial $80Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	11x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	115x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	58x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback