Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus KGP(M)E-D16 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory	57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160616
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 18 '21 at 04:03
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6272 74 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 46.5 2-Core 84.3 43% 66.8 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 274 25% 209 Pts	64-Core 767 48% 767 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450 15,395 User benchmarks, average bench 23% EVGA(3842 1584) 3GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	22.4% Poor	Lighting 25.8 Reflection 44 Parallax 30.3 21% 33.4 fps	MRender 42.9 Gravity 21.8 Splatting 29.2 25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 24%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 2TB 1.5TB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 739 786 302 207 225 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$229 4,222 User benchmarks, average bench 283% 2TB free Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 973 935 958 929 983 974 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	147% Outstanding	Read 993 Write 997 Mixed 742 SusWrite 959 208% 923 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 35.4 125% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 220 165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 389%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 32 56 126 137 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 118 Write 118 Mixed 57.6 SusWrite 94.7 71% 97.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 137GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 90 97 91 94 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 122 Write 86.6 Mixed 76.3 SusWrite 93.1 70% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 114%
DAS TerraMaster 10TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 8.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7 7 6.9 7 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.78% Terrible	Read 26 Write 24.4 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 6.9 15% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.78% Great: 105%
DAS TerraMaster 4TB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 3TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7 6.9 6.9 6.9 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.22% Terrible	Read 24.4 Write 24.4 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 6.9 15% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.22% Great: 92%
DAS TerraMaster 4TB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.9 7 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.69% Terrible	Read 26.2 Write 24.2 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 6.9 15% 20 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.69% Great: 92%
DAS TerraMaster 8TB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 6.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 6.9 6.9 6.8 6.9 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 26.6 Write 24.3 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 6.9 15% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.7 400% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16x4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 16 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34% Below average	MC Read 10 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 12.9 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 10.7 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 36%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $175Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353