Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus KGP(M)E-D16  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory60.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '21 at 22:39
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6272
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 97.8
47% 73.9 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 230
23% 189 Pts
64-Core 913
56% 913 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
EVGA(3842 1584) 3GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 25.9
Reflection 45.5
Parallax 30.4
21% 33.9 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 29.4
25% 31.4 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 234 220 202 203 254 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$229
2TB free
Firmware: P4CR311 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1053 1034 1042 1046 1065 1063 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,209
Write 1,095
Mixed 790
SusWrite 1,050
233% 1,036 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 47.7
148% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 228
173% 236 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 170%
Great: 389%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 26 102 125 145 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 85.9
Write 89.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 105
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
137GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 98 92 96 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 122
Write 72.4
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 94.6
68% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16x4GB
16 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.3% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.3
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 12.1
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback