Asus Z87-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '21 at 16:04
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 584
59% 477 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.22% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.4
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.22%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 730B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 7.7
5% 6.2 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1TB
577GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 42 63 22 54 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 460
Write 358
Mixed 197
SusWrite 54.8
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 12.5
56% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 33.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
20% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 154 161 163 165 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 105
Write 101
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 162
70% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
36% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 106%
Hitachi HDS72302 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: A5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 100 100 99 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 99.6
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
543GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 136 139 139 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 133
Write 80.5
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 138
71% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
928GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 98 99 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 106
Write 75.2
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 97.9
63% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 113%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 41 42 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 41
Write 39.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 42
53% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 124 129 130 129 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 160
Write 142
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 128
152% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
99% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 0420 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 0420 F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 0420 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PRO Builds (Compare 2,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PRO - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback