Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Memory 94.7 1-Core 122 2-Core 237 86% 151 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 576 66% 517 Pts	64-Core 581 36% 581 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8295) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,748 Write 4,979 Mixed 5,243 1,187% 5,323 MB/s	4K Read 362 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 148 805% 212 MB/s	DQ Read 863 DQ Write 545 DQ Mixed 619 484% 676 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 226GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	53.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 92.5 Mixed 78 SusWrite 85.3 66% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 110GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 106 Write 71.8 Mixed 6 65% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 39%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 490GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.1 9.7 9.1 9.2 9.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	4.8% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 5 Mixed 8.3 SusWrite 9.2 10% 7.75 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.8% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 19,207 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 19 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 19.1 53% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 58 69% 58 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	44x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	43x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $579