Dell PowerEdge T30

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell PowerEdge T30
Motherboard	Dell PowerEdge T30 (all builds)
Memory	56 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '21 at 23:24
Run Duration	318 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 3,017 User benchmarks, average bench 74% Socket 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 208 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 417 56% 416 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.2% Above average	Lighting 68.5 Reflection 77.4 Parallax 69.5 56% 71.8 fps	MRender 67.2 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 70.3 57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 357GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 665 569 580 577 601 576 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	194% Outstanding	Read 2199 Write 1,450 Mixed 1,223 SusWrite 595 303% 1,367 MB/s	4K Read 54.3 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 39.7 150% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,013 DQ Write 82.6 DQ Mixed 150 210% 415 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 194% Great: 340%
Crucial BX100 1TB-$500 1,367 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 931GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 279 321 322 344 323 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 492 Write 366 Mixed 313 SusWrite 308 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 24 4K Mixed 22.9 84% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 59.6 DQ Mixed 97 87% 137 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 108%
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 318% 318GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1300 1374 1353 1360 1412 1351 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	239% Outstanding	Read 2,254 Write 1,402 Mixed 1,109 SusWrite 1,358 341% 1,531 MB/s	4K Read 48.9 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 33.5 132% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,081 DQ Write 67.9 DQ Mixed 114 199% 421 MB/s
Poor: 219% ↑ This bench: 239% Great: 389%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$154 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1TB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 278 318 323 339 321 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	76.1% Very good	Read 491 Write 352 Mixed 369 SusWrite 306 85% 379 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 25.3 94% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 46.3 DQ Mixed 96.8 98% 167 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 125%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87 21,339 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 699GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 114 113 122 114 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 126 Write 98 Mixed 65.9 SusWrite 115 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 71%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 858GB free Firmware: AX1G1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 110 111 116 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 110 Write 111 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 112 67% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 62%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB 2,192 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 380GB free, PID 2101 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 22 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 35.4 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 20.9 39% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 18%
Seagate Portable 1TB 1,012 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 583GB free, PID 2332 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 21 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 33 Write 33.9 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 20.1 34% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4DFD824A.M16FD 859B0000802C CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD 859B0000802C CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD 859B0000802C CT16G4DFD824A.C16FBD 64GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.2% Very good	MC Read 26.9 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 24.6 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 27.6 SC Mixed 20.6 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PowerEdge T30 Builds (Compare 243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T30

CPU
Xeon E3-1225 v5IntelBench 74%, 3,017 samples	230x
Xeon E3-1275 v5IntelBench 78%, 368 samples	5x
Pentium G4400Intel $45Bench 47%, 36,432 samples	2x

GPU
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples	145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	19x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	11x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
Blue 250GBWD $80Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	9x
Raid 1 Volume 1TBIntelBench 199%, 1,177 samples	7x

RAM
HMA81GU7AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 397 samples	32x
HMA41GU7AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 41%, 298 samples	23x
HMA81GU7AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 72%, 206 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406