Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-54

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-54  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Octavia_CFS
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '21 at 03:36
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 237
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 542
59% 467 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1331) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.44% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 7.3
5% 26 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.44%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 512GB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 671 715 699 720 715 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 836
Write 741
Mixed 568
SusWrite 689
159% 709 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 41.7
150% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 939
DQ Write 424
DQ Mixed 533
434% 632 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 152%
Great: 203%
Seagate Portable 1TB
683GB free, PID 2332
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 93 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 82.4
Write 13.7
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 91.2
73% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
93% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-54 Builds (Compare 12,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-54

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback