Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJan 10 '21 at 11:51
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 959
97% 784 Pts
64-Core 1,166
72% 1,166 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
120% Outstanding
Lighting 158
Reflection 155
Parallax 154
128% 156 fps
MRender 198
Gravity 134
Splatting 120
120% 151 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 120%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 121 128 130 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 393
Write 123
Mixed 194
SusWrite 124
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 39.7
156% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 150
118% 164 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 73%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
102GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,510
Write 2,357
Mixed 1,598
479% 2,155 MB/s
4K Read 64.7
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 88.8
298% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1397
DQ Write 1,143
DQ Mixed 1,265
949% 1,269 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 EVO 500GB
206GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2213 2210 2204 2194 2194 2213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,664
Write 2,219
Mixed 1,529
SusWrite 2,205
483% 2,154 MB/s
4K Read 58.8
4K Write 186
4K Mixed 83.6
295% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,401
DQ Write 1,174
DQ Mixed 1,273
957% 1,282 MB/s
Poor: 219%
This bench: 389%
Great: 389%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
232GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 76 76 74 75 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 71.5
Write 52.7
Mixed 45
SusWrite 74.9
45% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 44.3
MC Mixed 29.8
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 47.8
SC Mixed 32.8
96% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 51.2
78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback