Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-VS3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS3  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '21 at 06:38
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User UZB-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 105
56% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 118
14% 110 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.16.11.9107
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.57% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.2
0% 0.57 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.6
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.57%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 16 17 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 15.7
Write 38.2
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 21.8
20% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 5.8
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS3 Builds (Compare 330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $93
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $284WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback