Today's hottest deals

HP 2133

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 2133  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3030
Memory1.1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 01:08
Run Duration1087 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
VIA C7-M 1600MHz
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Memory 24.7
1-Core 5.2
2-Core 6.1
10% 12 Pts
4-Core 6.3
8-Core 6.3
1% 6.3 Pts
64-Core 6.3
0% 6.3 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PC128HAFU-000L1 128GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM06L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 91 90 92 88 90 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.3% Poor
Read 139
Write 106
Mixed 104
SusWrite 89.5
25% 110 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 14.5
51% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 21.2
DQ Write 43.4
DQ Mixed 22.2
20% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 74%
Maxtor OneTouch III 60GB
17GB free, PID 7250
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
9.85% Terrible
Read 22.8
Write 16.9
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 16.9
22% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.85%
Great: 15%
Multi Flash Reader 2GB
0GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 5.2 5 5.2 5.3 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Read 8.9
Write 2.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.1
6% 5.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.4% Terrible
MC Read 1.3
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 2.1
7% 2.33 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 2
7% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 288
14% 288 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.4%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback