Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME X570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 20 '22 at 11:18
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 268
84% 158 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 892
83% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,435
89% 1,435 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.4% Very good
Lighting 95.6
Reflection 94.6
Parallax 76.5
78% 88.9 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 82.9
Splatting 75.7
62% 74.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,541
Write 2,097
Mixed 1,701
469% 2,113 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 67
220% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 413
350% 529 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
117GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,567
Write 2,241
Mixed 1,882
496% 2,230 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 74.8
244% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 997
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 481
402% 601 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
234GB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 448 448 448 449 293 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 447
Mixed 449
SusWrite 422
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 45.9
149% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 203 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB
298GB free
Firmware: 21.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 64 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 62.1
Write 62.7
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 63.3
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 26.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 24.5
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-PRO Builds (Compare 5,550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $832
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback