Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime4 Days
Run DateApr 01 '21 at 16:30
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$62
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 189
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 326
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
PwrHis(1787 D570) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1264 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.3.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.5% Average
Lighting 55.4
Reflection 59.9
Parallax 75.7
45% 63.7 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 58.6
Splatting 43.5
43% 54 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 240 11 101 25 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 469
Write 373
Mixed 367
SusWrite 127
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 1
39% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 1.1
22% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 102%
PNY CS900 240GB-$22
150GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 219 82 81 82 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 403
Write 229
Mixed 324
SusWrite 140
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 32.2
121% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 197
166% 239 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 91%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 69 70 69 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 99.7
Write 87.1
Mixed 70
SusWrite 69.8
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 77%
Imation Nano Pro 8GB
7GB free, PID 063d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 2.5 2 1.6 1.6 2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Read 14.4
Write 2.5
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 2.2
6% 5.95 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 9%
Sony Storage Media 8GB
7GB free, PID 05ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.4 4.1 4 4.4 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.77% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 5.5
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 4.5
14% 11 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.77%
Great: 9%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
3GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 22 21 18 6.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 24.7
Write 21
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 18.1
29% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 2.5
191% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2133C14D4/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.3% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 22.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 21
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback