Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2H  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 03:36
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 151
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 278
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.5% Average
Lighting 57.6
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 50.4
47% 56 fps
MRender 51.7
Gravity 39
Splatting 45.1
37% 45.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sony Storage Media 8GB
7GB free, PID 05ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 2.9 3 3.2 3.7 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 1.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.3
5% 4.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 4.2
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2H Builds (Compare 2,465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback