Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 23 '22 at 15:41
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 151
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 228
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.09
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 1.5
3% 3.47 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 23 2.8 2.5 15 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.5% Below average
Read 228
Write 179
Mixed 178
SusWrite 45.4
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 12.2
53% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 55
DQ Mixed 27.9
35% 64 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 53%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
128GB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 89 90 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 93
Write 102
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 90.5
59% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
28GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 5.7 7.6 6.3 7.9 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.31% Terrible
Read 23.8
Write 15.2
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 8.3
20% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
66% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.1% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 5.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback