Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1497
Memory	1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '22 at 15:41
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 77.7 2-Core 151 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 228 29% 220 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0835) 1GB CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.09 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.05% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 1.5 3% 3.47 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3 3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.05% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 23 2.8 2.5 15 49 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.5% Below average	Read 228 Write 179 Mixed 178 SusWrite 45.4 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 24.2 4K Mixed 12.2 53% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 55 DQ Mixed 27.9 35% 64 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 53%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465 6,270 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 128GB free Firmware: MJAOA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 89 90 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 93 Write 102 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 90.5 59% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 3,832 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 28GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 5.7 7.6 6.3 7.9 8.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.31% Terrible	Read 23.8 Write 15.2 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 8.3 20% 15.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.9 66% 1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.31% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 6GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.1% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 5.6 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	988x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	109x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	97x

RAM
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	19x
8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 2x2GBMicronBench 46%, 1,198 samples	18x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16