Shuttle SB95V20

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Shuttle SB95V20 (all builds)
Motherboard	Shuttle FB95V20
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20050915
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '21 at 03:35
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.00GHz 6,937 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	29.3% Poor	Memory 53.8 1-Core 20.6 2-Core 30.7 26% 35 Pts	4-Core 30.2 8-Core 30.4 4% 30.3 Pts	64-Core 28.9 2% 28.9 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 1,212 User benchmarks, average bench 1% XFX(1682 2220) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 302.80 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.91% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 0.1 1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.91% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF40 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 70 61 45 78 74 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.4% Very poor	Read 95.9 Write 102 Mixed 88.4 SusWrite 68.1 20% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 5.1 25% 7.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 56%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 931GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 77 76 56 94 97 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.2% Poor	Read 170 Write 96 Mixed 120 SusWrite 80.3 26% 116 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 11.8 43% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 63.9 DQ Write 37.8 DQ Mixed 44.8 35% 48.8 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 133%
SDXC Card 134GB 363 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 24GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 0.9 2.6 2.5 2.8 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Read 2.7 Write 1 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 2.6 3% 2.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 18%
MUSHKIN MKNUFDAM32GB 32GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 20GB free, PID 5200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 6.7 8.2 7 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	6.54% Terrible	Read 24.3 Write 17.9 Mixed 14.5 SusWrite 8.3 20% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.8 43% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.54% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.5 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 0.8 4% 1.27 GB/s	Latency 147 27% 147 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Shuttle SB95V20

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)