Today's hottest deals

Jumper EZbook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemJumper EZbook  (all builds)
MotherboardJumper P3132
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 16 '19 at 20:06
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3450
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 41
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 78.7
32% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 171
23% 171 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4839
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 2.03
2% 2.44 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.09
3% 3.12 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GMTS420S 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0807A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 0 0 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.3% Below average
Read 17.5
Write 94.3
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 19.3
8% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 59.6
4K Mixed 10.5
64% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 42.6
82% 162 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 87%
SDXC Card 134GB
110GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.9 2.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
1.64% Terrible
Read 4.5
Write 2.3
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 3
4% 2.88 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.64%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x3GB
2 of 2 slots used
6GB DIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EZbook Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Jumper EZbook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback