Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120919
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 23:22
Run Duration447 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 81
2-Core 202
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 343
45% 339 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 853A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.95% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.3
1% 0.53 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.95%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 33 16 40 41 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
45% Average
Read 118
Write 112
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 38.6
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
396GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 134 131 133 132 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 83.5
Write 119
Mixed 59
SusWrite 130
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.63% Terrible
Read 22.2
Write 22.5
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 10.1
15% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
179% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.63%
Great: 87%
Iomega E xternal HD 1TB
175GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.4 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 24.8
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 9.4
29% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 20%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
741GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.4 9.3 9.4 9.3 9.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 23.4
Mixed 23.4
SusWrite 9.4
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 22%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 35 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 34.6
Write 30.1
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 35.6
44% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 22%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
10GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 39 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 36.8
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 40.7
49% 36 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 22%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
929GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.1 0.1 1.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 40.5
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 0.5
38% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HD105SI 1TB
313GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5 5.6 5 5 6.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
Read 40.9
Write 40.5
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 5.3
38% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
125% 1.43 MB/s
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
940GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Read 32.1
Write 25
Mixed 25
SusWrite 0.6
26% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 59%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.6 8.5 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 17.4
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 8.6
26% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 59%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 25.1
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 0.6
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 59%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
244GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 36 38 38 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 40.4
Write 41.2
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 37
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,763 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback