Chuwi CoreBook X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemChuwi CoreBook X  (all builds)
MotherboardCHUWI CoreBook X
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '21 at 16:58
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 111
2-Core 204
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 305
41% 307 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 12.8
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8P0S3256B-A0 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 383 227 168 171 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 447
Write 388
Mixed 340
SusWrite 246
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 36.9
138% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 210
183% 269 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.7% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 19.3
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 17.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CoreBook X Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi CoreBook X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback