Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	13.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '21 at 21:51
Run Duration	362 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 97.6 1-Core 117 2-Core 200 82% 138 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 600 63% 503 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% MSI(1462 C75A) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Lighting 96.7 Reflection 94.5 Parallax 90.4 79% 93.9 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 84 Splatting 75.2 73% 91.6 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 76%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 84CA) 3GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.53% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 3 3% 3.1 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 5.1 4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.53% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 503ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 157 172 145 154 147 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.5% Good	Read 239 Write 208 Mixed 205 SusWrite 158 46% 203 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 33.4 112% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 144 120% 172 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 94%
Corsair Force LE200 SSD 480GB 252GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 134 100 105 81 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	166% Outstanding	Read 271 Write 125 Mixed 156 SusWrite 120 206% 168 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 17.8 1,742% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 18.2 DQ Write 38.5 DQ Mixed 25.1 2,231% 27.3 MB/s

WDC WD10 02FBYS-01A6B0 1TB 334GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 17 12 14 11 9.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28% Poor	Read 109 Write 104 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 15.4 94% 74.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.9 129% 1.53 MB/s

WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Y9A0 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 581GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 93.3 Write 94 Mixed 90 SusWrite 0.2 90% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 55%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 370GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0.1 0 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Read 90.5 Write 91 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 0.1 75% 59.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 47%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 338GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 92 94 99 92 91 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	35.3% Below average	Read 71.8 Write 72 Mixed 69 SusWrite 94.8 107% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 45%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 391GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 79.8 Write 82.3 Mixed 52.8 SusWrite 0.1 68% 53.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 66%
WDC WD30 EZRX-22D8PB0 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 331GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.1 0.1 0 0.2 0.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.4% Poor	Read 103 Write 98.5 Mixed 64 SusWrite 0.2 82% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 21%
WDC WD30 EZRX-22D8PB0 3TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 135GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.9% Poor	Read 102 Write 99.5 Mixed 64 SusWrite 11.9 87% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 21%
WDC WD30 EURS-63R8UY0 3TB 330GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	24.4% Poor	Read 129 Write 122 Mixed 77 SusWrite 0 101% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.1 MB/s

WDC WD10 1EFAX-68LDBN0 10TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 4TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.1 1.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.5% Average	Read 189 Write 200 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 0.3 141% 116 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 1.3 258% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 47%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 361GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 72.5 Write 75.7 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 0 64% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 47%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68EUZN0 4TB 3.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.2% Below average	Read 176 Write 171 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 0 130% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1.3 164% 1.9 MB/s

WD 10EADS External 1TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 93GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 27.7 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 13.8 33% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 21%
WD 10EADS External 1TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 31GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 34 Write 28.5 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 14 34% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 21%
WD 10EADS External 1TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 32GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 27.7 Mixed 27 SusWrite 14 33% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB 2,772 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	76% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 22.9 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.9 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 23 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 47.9 84% 47.9 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	829x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	556x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	316x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	140x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	138x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	125x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	72x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	70x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	62x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	59x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $851

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16