Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion NQ982AA-ABU p6061uk (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20081216
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 25 '21 at 09:24
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8200-$49 19,990 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.35 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Memory 58.5 1-Core 32.5 2-Core 63.8 34% 51.6 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 115 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 112 7% 112 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 1603) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 3.1 3% 3.97 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 5.1 3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 230 Write 190 Mixed 198 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 41.3 4K Mixed 26.4 94% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 199 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 21.6 56% 120 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 98GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 109 110 110 110 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 102 Write 71.7 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 108 63% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 114%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$80 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 69.7 Write 62.9 Mixed 48.4 45% 60.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 88%
Sony MRW-E90 32GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 29GB free, PID 0bae Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 15 14 15 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.92% Terrible	Read 30.3 Write 13 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 14.5 22% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.92% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.27 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 4650ATIBench 3%, 1,681 samples	1x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	1x

SSD
240GB SSD 240GB3Bench 64%, 3,846 samples	1x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	1x

RAM
5GBUnknownBench 18%, 14,654 samples	1x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	1x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $49

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16