Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '18 at 14:19
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 91.6 1-Core 107 2-Core 217 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 768 71% 595 Pts	64-Core 1,157 72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 143 Parallax 123 108% 133 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 126 Splatting 105 91% 112 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 461GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6944 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 57 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 51 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 98 98 1208 (EB) Unknown 99 99 43 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5887788277	93.1% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 410 Mixed 419 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 38 133% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 36.7 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 118 99% 136 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 427GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7750 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 36 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 53 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 29 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4389569859	104% Outstanding	Read 511 Write 415 Mixed 418 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 44.3 167% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 38.2 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 109 99% 142 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 325GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 770 Write 636 Mixed 668 154% 691 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 28.1 117% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 36.7 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 26.2 62% 119 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 283%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 3TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2TB free, PID 0a10 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 134 Write 129 Mixed 103 154% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.18 70% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 59%
WD My Book 25EE 3TB 3,089 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2TB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Read 168 Write 163 Mixed 106 181% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 2.35 4K Mixed 0.26 92% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 91%
Sony MRW-E90 32GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 27GB free, PID 0bae Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 294 Write 70 Mixed 117 165% 160 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 1.86 172% 5.06 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR 32GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	MC Read 47.9 MC Write 42.8 MC Mixed 41.4 126% 44 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 21.8 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4-CF Builds (Compare 805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	428x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	116x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	50x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	23x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	20x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $457

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16