Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateJun 04 '17 at 01:27
Run Duration376 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 224
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 534
57% 454 Pts
64-Core 568
35% 568 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$200
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 116
Parallax 95.7
88% 106 fps
MRender 95.8
Gravity 97.7
Splatting 101
81% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
391GB free
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 345
Write 253
Mixed 256
63% 285 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 16.8
75% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 47.3
73% 142 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 99%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
57GB free
Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 254
Write 227
Mixed 248
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 4.96
72% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 29.3
62% 127 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 78%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
56GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 255
Write 72.3
Mixed 109
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 16.4
85% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 95.6
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 24.9
35% 65 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 69%
Intel 330 Series 180GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 415
Write 142
Mixed 174
53% 244 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 11.2
74% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 43.1
72% 139 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 83%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
5GB free
Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
69% Good
Read 423
Write 202
Mixed 284
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 20.8
100% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 46.5
83% 164 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 113
Write 113
Mixed 79.8
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.59
4K Mixed 0.2
75% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 88%
Samsung HD502IJ 3TB
542GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.7% Very good
Read 159
Write 119
Mixed 115
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.78
4K Mixed 0.2
76% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 80%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 127
Write 125
Mixed 123
161% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.21
70% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 52%
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
620GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 81
124% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.21
80% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
517GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 122
Write 120
Mixed 99.4
144% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.22
78% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50%
Great: 45%
HGST HDN 724030ALE640 3TB
64GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
Read 107
Write 81.7
Mixed 77.2
109% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M379B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.8% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro4 Builds (Compare 786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4 - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $560
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $155
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback