Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '15 at 11:14
Run Duration512 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
70% 154 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 390
53% 393 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 47% Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5382
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 43.5
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 50.4
36% 44.5 fps
MRender 54.4
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 36.4
34% 42.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 512GB-$500
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 463
Write 234
Mixed 227
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 10.6
50% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 55.8
DQ Mixed 36.5
58% 118 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 109
Write 66.4
Mixed 64.4
60% 79.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.23
92% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 84%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
189GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 83.1
Write 49.2
Mixed 74.8
52% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.22
71% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38%
Great: 51%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
148GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 52.6
Mixed 53.7
40% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.41
110% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 44%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 110
Write 108
Mixed 94.7
133% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.23
78% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 50%
WDC WD20 EADS-00S2B0 2TB
291GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 18.2
Mixed 14.1
24% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.62
4K Mixed 0.24
65% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 21%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
33GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
40% Average
Read 109
Write 85.1
Mixed 77.7
111% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.2
70% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 40%
Great: 50%
WDC WD20 EARS-14MVWB0 2TB
12GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 16.1
Mixed 4.91
18% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.16
58% 0.65 MB/s
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
8GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 17.2
Mixed 6.45
20% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.18
66% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 21%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
5GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 18
Mixed 17.2
26% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.19
67% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 19%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
2GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 76.9
Write 71.9
Mixed 66.3
91% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.18
57% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 50%
Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback