HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory2.4 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 02:19
Run Duration1987 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 109
48% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 206
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Asus(1043 8266) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.7 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 13.9
Splatting 0.5
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 1.52%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$82
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC98
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 70 22 39 3.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 116
Write 101
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 28.4
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 75%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 1TB
732GB free
Firmware: 0103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.3
Write 25.7
Mixed 25.2
20% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
118% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 78%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 500GB
17GB free
Firmware: 0103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.7
Write 14
Mixed 17
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 65%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 1TB
346GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 29.2
Mixed 22
SusWrite 2.1
15% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 70%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 1TB
549GB free
Firmware: 0103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.7
Write 19.7
Mixed 19.2
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 70%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 040B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.9
Write 23
Mixed 27.3
19% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.6
188% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
841GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7 6.8 7 6.9 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.39% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 21.7
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 6.9
14% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
150% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 87%
WDC WD16 00BEVE-00UYT0 160GB
148GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.5
Write 20.3
Mixed 19.7
27% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 16%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
2TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30
Write 21.7
Mixed 21.5
30% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 22%
Iomega E xternal HD 1TB
141GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 28.5
Write 21
Mixed 22.3
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 20%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
465GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.5
Write 21.8
Mixed 18
27% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 20%
General UDisk 134GB
125GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9.2
Write 4.7
Mixed 1.7
6% 5.2 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 32%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 64GB
39GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Mixed 1.7
3% 1.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
651GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.7 1 1 0.3 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
6.76% Terrible
Read 27.2
Write 21.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 3.6
24% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.76%
Great: 59%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
584GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.9 0.2 0 0.1 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 28
Write 21.7
Mixed 23
SusWrite 0.5
23% 18.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 59%
ST325031 0AS 250GB
39GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6 5.7 5.9 5.8 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
8.7% Terrible
Read 27
Write 20.5
Mixed 23
SusWrite 5.8
24% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.7%
Great: 18%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB
152GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
8.68% Terrible
Read 30.3
Write 24
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 0.8
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.68%
Great: 18%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 30
Write 23.7
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 7.4
27% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:83 0B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI ID:83 0B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
30.3% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 13.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.8
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback