Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive455% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory43.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200724
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '20 at 20:59
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$137
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 305
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 919
88% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,373
85% 1,373 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 150
Parallax 136
112% 141 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 141
Splatting 124
105% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte Aorus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3497 3659 3742 3753 3746 3738 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
455% Outstanding
Read 2,090
Write 3,545
Mixed 2,196
SusWrite 3,689
655% 2,880 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 84.8
280% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,443
DQ Write 1,194
DQ Mixed 1,319
988% 1,319 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 455%
Great: 491%
Amd-raid Samsung SSD 850 500GB
121GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 325 343 378 300 288 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 402
Write 383
Mixed 327
SusWrite 325
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 34.7
113% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 92
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 113
88% 119 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 99%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZRX-00D 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 118 117 134 113 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 106
Write 132
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 114
69% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
90% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 84%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 78 70 89 72 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 84.1
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 77.9
50% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 190%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 16GB
10GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 7.3 5.7 6.3 6.2 6.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 18
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 8
18% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
104% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 24%
Kingston DT 100 G2 16GB
14GB free, PID 1653
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.8 8.7 8.7 8.4 8.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
8.31% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 8.6
13% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 8%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 1GB
0GB free, PID 652d, Toshiba 1GB
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 20.2
Write 17.2
Mixed 15.5
22% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
57% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 48GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 37.4
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 37.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $499

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,531
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback